Resource
Article [7216]
General
[1038]
Acceptance
[63]
Ad Hoc
[28]
Agile, Scrum
[233]
Black Box
[117]
Bug, Defect
[258]
DB, Test Data
[274]
Environment
[43]
Functional
[115]
Glossary, Term
[74]
GUI, Usability
[98]
Integrate test
[47]
Interview, FAQ
[288]
Manual Testing
[117]
Methodology
[232]
Metrics
[332]
Mobile, Embed
[154]
Performance
[327]
Process
[194]
Requirement
[124]
Review, Static
[102]
Risk
[99]
Security Test
[215]
Standard, ISO
[179]
Test Automate
[349]
Test Case
[343]
Test Design
[70]
Test Plan
[314]
Test Manage
[228]
Test Script
[56]
Test Technique
[265]
Tool
[177]
Tool- Jmeter
[41]
Tool- Selenium
[127]
Unit Test
[167]
Web Test
[258]
White Box
[70]
Ebook [1170]
General
[281]
Acceptance
[3]
Agile, Scrum
[24]
DB Test
[77]
Development
[137]
GUI, Usability
[17]
Interview, FAQ
[9]
Java Test
[68]
Metrics
[17]
Mobile, Embed
[14]
Performance
[49]
Process
[11]
Requirement
[55]
Review, Analysis
[8]
Risk
[7]
Security Test
[72]
Standard
[20]
Test Manage
[86]
Test Automate
[84]
Tool
[8]
Unit Test
[67]
Web Test
[60]
Testing Tool [2277]
Acceptance
[25]
Agile, Scrum
[42]
Bug Tracking
[127]
Build, Release
[27]
Environment
[58]
DB, Test Data
[83]
Functional
[240]
GUI, Usability
[79]
Java Test
[71]
Metrics
[57]
Mobile, Embed
[79]
Network Test
[67]
Performance
[222]
Requirement
[62]
Review, Static
[105]
Security Test
[111]
Test Design
[52]
Test Manage
[208]
Unit, Debug
[224]
Utility, Capture
[97]
Web Testing
[235]
Video [622]
News [2773]
Webinar [914]
Certification Resource
CTAL [271]
CTEL [35]
CSTE, CSQA [198]
CSQE [41]
CMMI, TMMI [135]
PMP [115]
ITIL [67]
Six Sigma [41]
Other [83]
Forum
Forum [1941]
Book
[56]
Certification
[48]
Conference
[64]
ISTQB
[159]
QTP
[93]
Software Test
[1065]
Standard, ISO
[89]
Testing Tool
[288]
ashok_kiruthiThe use of Equivalence classes as the basis for functional
testing has two motivations:
1. To have a sense of “complete” testing
2. Avoid redundancy (not having serious gaps)
• Are any of those realized by Boundary Value Testing? Why?
Combining Boundary Value Analysis with Equivalence Class Testing
testing has two motivations:
1. To have a sense of “complete” testing
2. Avoid redundancy (not having serious gaps)
• Are any of those realized by Boundary Value Testing? Why?
Combining Boundary Value Analysis with Equivalence Class Testing
- Equivalence class testing is strengthened by a hybrid approach with boundary value testing
- For each equivalence class select the elements representing the class as you would in boundary value analysis, select the min, min+, nom, max- & max.
- Robust testing could be used to show the effects of invalid test cases when using min- and max+ like in the month variable in the NextDate problem

Ashokkumar
Service
New
Popular Documents
Weekly
Monthly
Yearly
Popular Download
Weekly
Monthly
Twitter
tag
Automation
QA
Quality
mobile testing
security testing
tool
web testing
Guide
test plan
QTP
process
Manual
web
Test
Software Testing
software qa service
ISTQB
agile testing
QC
Test Case
checklist
Template
mobile application testing
Exam
Selenium
performance
Interview
outsourcing software testing
PM
Management
agile
Questions
security
Performance Testing
Certification
Software
conference
Plan
Development
Bug
Unit Testing
Metrics
mobile
Sample Exam
framework
tester
testing
Test Automation
Sql
software testing company
HP
Visitor
Member Login (IP)
305971
163868
209681866
Yesterday
Today
Total

 
 

article is accurate and brief ... but i think its too brief to be more effective ... anyway ... good effort ..... keep it up.