Resource
Article [7183]
General
[1032]
Acceptance
[63]
Ad Hoc
[28]
Agile, Scrum
[231]
Black Box
[117]
Bug, Defect
[258]
DB, Test Data
[274]
Environment
[42]
Functional
[115]
Glossary, Term
[74]
GUI, Usability
[98]
Integrate test
[46]
Interview, FAQ
[285]
Manual Testing
[117]
Methodology
[231]
Metrics
[327]
Mobile, Embed
[153]
Performance
[326]
Process
[194]
Requirement
[124]
Review, Static
[102]
Risk
[99]
Security Test
[215]
Standard, ISO
[179]
Test Automate
[347]
Test Case
[340]
Test Design
[69]
Test Plan
[311]
Test Manage
[227]
Test Script
[56]
Test Technique
[265]
Tool
[179]
Tool- Jmeter
[40]
Tool- Selenium
[125]
Unit Test
[166]
Web Test
[258]
White Box
[70]
Ebook [1164]
General
[277]
Acceptance
[3]
Agile, Scrum
[24]
DB Test
[76]
Development
[137]
GUI, Usability
[17]
Interview, FAQ
[10]
Java Test
[68]
Metrics
[17]
Mobile, Embed
[14]
Performance
[49]
Process
[11]
Requirement
[55]
Review, Analysis
[8]
Risk
[7]
Security Test
[71]
Standard
[20]
Test Manage
[85]
Test Automate
[84]
Tool
[8]
Unit Test
[67]
Web Test
[60]
Testing Tool [2276]
Acceptance
[25]
Agile, Scrum
[42]
Bug Tracking
[127]
Build, Release
[27]
Environment
[58]
DB, Test Data
[83]
Functional
[240]
GUI, Usability
[79]
Java Test
[71]
Metrics
[57]
Mobile, Embed
[79]
Network Test
[67]
Performance
[222]
Requirement
[62]
Review, Static
[105]
Security Test
[111]
Test Design
[52]
Test Manage
[208]
Unit, Debug
[224]
Utility, Capture
[97]
Web Testing
[234]
Video [622]
News [2773]
Webinar [914]
Certification Resource
CTAL [269]
CTEL [35]
CSTE, CSQA [198]
CSQE [41]
CMMI, TMMI [135]
PMP [114]
ITIL [67]
Six Sigma [41]
Other [81]
Forum
Forum [1935]
Book
[56]
Certification
[48]
Conference
[64]
ISTQB
[158]
QTP
[92]
Software Test
[1062]
Standard, ISO
[89]
Testing Tool
[287]
This paper outlines some basic testing guidance provided by the Microsoft Dynamics® AX 2009 internal development team in support of Independent Software Vendors (ISV) building product extensions for the product. Much of this guidance also applies to Microsoft Dynamics AX implementation partners and customers who are customizing the application. Ensuring that an ERP application works after it is deployed at a customer site is an extremely challenging endeavor. The base application, which is both broad and deep, has a myriad of modules, features, software and hardware configurations. ISVs extend or modify the base application to provide functionality for specific market needs and verticals. Finally, implementation partners or customers do point customizations to address specific customer needs. This combination of base application, one or more ISV add-ons, and point customizations that operate in a unique hardware and software configuration is what businesses depend on for mission critical financial data and company operations. A challenge, indeed! ISVs and implementation partners typically do not have much guidance or tooling available to help in their efforts to guarantee a quality deployment for customers. This paper is a first step in providing some guidance. Over time, this guidance will evolve and tools will come on-line to better support the AX ecosystem. There are many factors that impact the quality of software. This paper will address only a few factors that are typically associated with the discipline of software testing.
Service
New
Popular Documents
Weekly
Monthly
Yearly
Popular Download
Weekly
Monthly
Twitter
tag
Quality
Metrics
Development
Sample Exam
web
HP
Plan
web testing
Software Testing
test plan
process
mobile
Bug
PM
Questions
QA
Management
Test Case
checklist
ISTQB
tool
Interview
mobile testing
Test management
Automation
Performance Testing
agile
Sql
Template
security testing
Test Automation
Unit Testing
software qa service
QTP
Guide
outsourcing software testing
performance
security
Test
mobile application testing
Certification
framework
Software
Selenium
Exam
tester
software testing company
testing
agile testing
Manual
conference
Visitor
Member Login (IP)
208696
91551
202703758
Yesterday
Today
Total

 
 
MeoMeoThi
httien
thanks